
2017年伊始,面對行業回暖,美國頁巖領域開支不斷增加,大部分石油巨頭似乎都在蠢蠢欲動,如道達爾收購圖洛石油烏干達項目股份、statoil計劃增加30%的鉆井勘探活動……而在此背景下,16年就已大動筋骨的殼牌,17年又會有怎樣的舉動呢?
作者 | Nick Cunningham
編譯 | 阿佳徐
2016年的殼牌可謂是出盡了風頭,不僅問鼎最受歡迎行業雇主,還完成了BG收購,成為LNG行業當仁不讓的“霸主”,甚至在巴西鹽下層領域,殼牌也占據著不容忽視的主導地位,但常年高支出和極速膨脹的赤字,迫使這家荷蘭石油巨頭不得不在2017年下定決心“減肥”!
殼牌債務水平攀至新高度
即使2017年油氣業的好氣象能極大改善全球油企的財務現狀,也不代表每家油企都能以相同方式搭上油市反彈的“快車”。比如,美國小型頁巖企業的資產大多集中在高利潤業務領域,如二疊紀盆地,這些企業可以趁著形勢好,在新一年里提升支出、增加鉆井活動,以改善企業運營狀況;但對于像殼牌一樣的大型油企來說,他們資產涵蓋了上下游全部領域,業務遍及全球,面對市場回暖,他們可能無法快速做出反應,運營欠缺靈活,因此他們會選擇與小型企業完全不同的發展戰策略。
這種模式雖能使石油巨頭們在油價波動時擁有更強的抗壓能力,但也有可能使他們無法盡情享受2017年的潛在驚喜。
殼牌就是其一,該公司今年將減緩擴張步伐,進一步縮緊戰略基金。2017年,殼牌債務水平仍居高不下,最新數據顯示,殼牌債務已膨脹至780億美元,比??松梨冢ㄘ搨?62億美元)高出40%;此外,殼牌杠桿比率(債務與股本比率)也高達29%,遠高于其他石油巨頭。
潛力無限 瘦身皆因它起
BG收購案是造成殼牌債務飆升的主要原因,該公司于2016年以530億美元收購BG后,不僅一舉成為全球最大的LNG出口商,而且獲得了澳大利亞和東非地區規模龐大的氣田。
殼牌始終相信,LNG領域的發展是一場長期博弈,未來幾十年,尤其是中國,天然氣需求必將大幅提升,擴張天然氣領域版圖絕對是搶占未來商機的不二之選。且2017年,Cooper Energy也收購了Santos維多利亞天然氣資產,Energean也在天然氣領域投入大筆資金……這些油企的最新動向似乎也印證了殼牌的說法。
因此,即使公司負債提升、運營風險增加,殼牌也要博得先機,成為未來天然氣供應領域的主宰者。公司高管們打賭,殼牌將在未來幾年收獲意想不到的回報。但在等待回報的過程中,殼牌不的不勒緊腰帶。
為了償還債務,殼牌也早已制定了一項長期“套現”計劃。而執行530億美元的收購案無疑是為殼牌緊縮支出、資產套現帶來了更大緊迫性。殼牌計劃于2016-2018年剝離300億美元資產,而2016年,殼牌僅剝離50億美元資產,低于60-80億美元的目標值。
殼牌準備剝離的資產遍布全球,包括北海價值30億美元的一批油田及加蓬、新西蘭、伊拉克、泰國的業務等。公司堅稱,其將在今年加快資產剝離速度,完成預定目標,以維持股息分紅并擴大現金流。
而即使公司承諾了股息保持不變,殼牌債務問題也是股東們最擔憂的問題。盡管公司已經開始實施資產剝離計劃,但能否真正降低負債率才是說服股東的關鍵。
研究公司Sanford C. Bernstein在近期報告中指出,殼牌的高凈債額及緩慢的資產剝離速度仍是投資們需考慮的首要問題,因為這是削減股息的主要風險。
殼牌忙“瘦身” BP玩“反轉”
在殼牌縮緊財政步伐的同時,它的英國同行BP正打算隨著市場反彈而大展拳腳。BP于2016年末簽署了諸多協議,并將在阿布扎比、毛里塔尼亞、塞內加爾、埃及及美國墨西哥灣的原油項目上增加數十億美元預算。
BP與殼牌的發展軌跡不同,自2010年深水地平線事故后,BP經歷了為期5年的財政緊縮期,那時,殼牌正處于擴張熱潮,而此時情況卻恰恰相反,殼牌開始了縮緊之路,BP卻準備擴張。
近期,Dudley也向彭博社透露, BP已經從深海地平線事故的陰影中走了出來,現在正是公司重新定位、發展的黃金時代!
若2017年油價能持續回升,那么所有油企都將受益,但這并不意味著每個企業都將利用這個時機進行擴張或增加鉆探活動。大放異彩后,也許養精蓄銳才是上上之策。
Oil prices are rising and the industry is poised for a rebound, with U.S. shale spending set to soar in 2017. But for Royal Dutch Shell, this year will be much more mundane as years of high spending and ballooning deficits force the Anglo-Dutch oil major to retrench.
Even as the New Year promises to bring a sharp improvement in the finances of oil companies across the world, including Shell, not everyone will approach the rebound in the oil market in the same way. Smaller U.S. shale companies, with assets concentrated in some highly profitable areas such as the Permian, are planning to sharply increase spending and drilling. But the oil majors are less nimble, having assets diversified upstream and downstream, spread out across the globe. They were able to weather the oil price downturn better than their smaller peers, but they respond much more slowly to fluctuations in the oil market. That stability is a feature for many investors looking to avoid volatility, but it also means that 2017 may not bring much excitement from the majors.
Shell, more so than some of its peers, will be seeking a smaller footprint this year. After spending more than $50 billion on BG Group, the war chest is running a little low. On top of that, Shell has seen its debt pile swell to an astonishing $78 billion, much more than other oil majors. That is 40 percent more than the $46.2 billion in debt that ExxonMobil reported at the end of the third quarter of 2016. Shell’s gearing ratio – a ratio of debt to equity – topped 29 percent, which is alsohigher than its peers.Related: The End Of The Rally? Oil Reverses, Natural Gas Trounced
The hefty price that paid for BG Group, Shell insists, will ultimately prove to be worthwhile. The acquisition was a long-term play on LNG, with sizable assets in Australia and East Africa. Shell is now one of the largest exporters of LNG in the world, and the company is betting on rising demand for gas, particularly in China, for decades to come. Shell has run up its debt in order to position itself as the dominant global gas supplier, a move that company executives believe that bet will pay off big-time in the years ahead.
But while it waits to see returns on those investments, Shell will have to tighten its belt in the interim. Even before the purchase of BG Group, Shell had laid out a multiyear divestment program in order to pay down debt. The $50 billion price tag for BG Group has put a much greater urgency on cutting costs, shrinking its footprint, and selling off assets to raise cash. Shell is in the midst of a three-year, $30 billion divestment scheme that runs from 2016 to 2018, but the pace of asset disposal is running behind the company’s targets. According to the Wall Street Journal, Shell only sold off $5 billion in assets in 2016, a bit shy of the $6 to $8 billion it had hoped for.
Shell’s debt problems are a worry for shareholders. Paying down debt and selling off the least productive assets are integral to preserving the company’s sacrosanct dividend policy. Shell insists its dividend will not change, but reining in debt will be key to convincing shareholders that that is the case.Related: Amazon’s Craziest New Business Plan
“Shell’s high net debt and the slow progress against its divestment plan are the last major concerns for investors, with the view that it remains the key risk for a dividend cut,” Sanford C. Bernstein, a research firm, wrote in a recent note to clients.
Shell insists it will hit its divestment targets, an indication that asset sales could pick up pace this year. Shell has oil and gas producing assets across the globe are potentially on the chopping block, including in New Zealand, Iraq, Thailand, Gabon and the UK’s North Sea.
Meanwhile, as Shell is trying to shrink, its British counterpart BP is looking to grow with the oil market rebound. BP inked a rash of deals at the end of 2016, announcing plans to spend billions of dollars on oil projects in Abu Dhabi, Mauritania and Senegal, offshore Egypt, and the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. BP and Shell are at different points in their evolution – BP already went through a half-decade of retrenchment after the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster, a period of time in which Shell embarked upon a spending spree. Now Shell is cutting back and BP is ready to grow. “It’s time for BP to start growing,”Dudley told Bloomberg TV a few weeks ago. “We’ve walked through so many difficulties in the U.S. that I think the company now is well-positioned for growth.”
If oil prices continue to rise in 2017, it will tend to lift all boats in the energy sector. But that does not mean that every company will use that improvement to pursue growth or step up drilling activity.
未經允許,不得轉載本站任何文章:
-
- 阿佳徐
-
石油圈認證作者
- 畢業于黑龍江大學英語口譯專業,具有豐富的翻譯工作經驗。致力于觀察國際油氣行業動態,能夠快速、準確傳遞油氣行業最新資訊,提供豐富的油氣信息,把握行業動向,為國內企業提供專業的資訊服務。(QQ:348418756)