?
近期油價一直徘徊于50美元以下,綜合多種因素分析,目前油價是在多種競爭機制下形成,國際原油市場已經不是石油壟斷組織OPEC所能左右的,近期油價不僅沒有繼續上漲的動力,而且50美元的價格將都難以為繼。
2014年11月,石油輸出國組織OPEC決定大幅增加原油產量,試圖用降低油價的方式將其競爭對手美國逐出石油市場??刂浦?0%的原油和60%的國際石油貿易組織的OPEC完全有能力影響全球石油市場。頁巖油的繁榮已經造成原油供給過量,原油在降到最低點約27美元/桶之前,已經從2014年的峰值跌去了75%以上。之后,市場從2016年1月的油價低點,大幅反彈了67%。然而,許多經濟學家預計近期石油價格上漲的趨勢是短暫的,因為供應量仍在不斷增加而需求量在不斷下降。
日益增加的供應量
截至2016年6月,美國的石油產量達到了自1972年以來的最高水平,產量大約為900萬桶/天,在過去的8年里增加了89%。如果OPEC仍按照目前的產能進行生產,那么到2016年底,產能過剩量將達到95萬桶/天,比3月的預期增加了16萬桶/天。
2016年,隨著產量的增加,美國原油的進口量也仍在激增。根據聯邦政府的數據,在2015年5月原油進口量觸及近20年的低點后,到目前進口量已增加了20%至800萬桶/天。這種現象是由多種因素造成的,其中包括美國對伊朗取消了經濟制裁,以及過剩的原油存儲庫容和國內較高的運輸成本。
美國撤銷對伊朗的制裁
盡管伊朗沒有直接向美國出口石油,但解除經濟制裁間接導致美國原油進口量的上升。在2016年1月美國撤銷對伊朗的制裁后,伊朗用開始用壓低競爭對手的價格的方式來搶占失去的市場份額。由于伊朗壓低油價,失去亞洲和歐洲市場的石油輸出國,開始把石油大量賣到美國市場,這還是頁巖繁榮期以來首次出現的現象。
庫存過剩
2016年5月,美國原油的進口需求主要受石油貿易商驅動。這些貿易商利用他們在美國巨大的原油儲存庫容,持有原油并期望通過期貨市場賣出高價。美國只占用了約66%的石油儲存庫容,還可以存儲近1億桶石油。相比之下,歐洲的存儲庫容已經使用了90%,而南非和中國的儲庫幾乎已滿。此外,造成進口量增長的另一原因是美國國內高昂的火車運輸成本,經火車運輸的原油價格比從國外進口原油還高,因此造成美國庫存過剩。
需求下降
油價下跌的最主要的原因是全球原油供給量已創新的歷史記錄,而且需求量也在減少。2015年,對石油的需求比上年增加了154萬桶/天。2016年的預測需求增長量至年底預計將放緩至120萬桶/天。造成減少的原因之一是全球各國國內生產總值(GDP)增長率的下降。從2014年到2015年,全球GDP增長從3.9%下降到3.1%,預計在2016年仍將保持這一趨勢,經濟學家預測的增長率在2.3~2.8%之間。造成需求下降的另一個主要因素是美元的強勢和反彈。隨著美元走強,使用外幣購買石油的價格將越來越高。根據摩根士丹利的分析,美元升值5%可能導致油價下跌10~25%。
投資選擇
對于想加大石油投資的投資者,美國石油基金(United States Oil Fund LP,NYSEARCA: USO)和能源行業股票基金(Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund,NYSEARCA: XLE)是最受歡迎的選擇。然而,這些基金之間有很大的區別。XLE費率低為0.14%,股息收益率高幾乎達到3%,投資了全球42家石油公司,其中??松梨冢?NYSE:XOM)和雪佛龍(NYSE:CVX)共占約33.65%的比重。其多樣性的投資以及良好的股息收益率和費率,使XLE成為長線投資者的最佳選擇。
而USO只適合有經驗的石油領域短期投資者。由于ETF的設計,其主要投資于近月石油期貨合約并跟蹤每日價格波動,USO的管理費過高達0.45%,存在時間耗損。USO必須每月在到期前出售其當前的期貨合約,再轉到下一個月的合同。由于期貨合約的定價規則,投資者越是長期看好USO,由時間耗損帶來展期收益的可能性就越大。為了徹底理解這些因素如何影響USO的長線價格,投資者可以回看2009年和2010年的數據,當時石油現貨價格增漲了98.74%,而USO僅上漲3.12%。
總之,近期原油價格一直在50美元上下徘徊,主要是撤銷制裁的伊朗及其他OPEC國家的增產等因素造成供應量過剩,而全球經濟增長放緩和美元走強等因素又造成需求量減少所致,未來我們要做好油價長期維持在50美元上下的準備。
作者/Chase Carmichael ? ?譯者/白小明 ? ? 編輯/Wang Yue
In November 2014, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) decided to increase its production of oil aggressively in an attempt to lower the price and force its U.S. competitors out of the market. Controlling 40% of global crude oil and 60% of internationally traded petroleum, OPEC is able to exert significant control over the market. Coupled with an already excessive supply created by the shale oil boom, oil had proceeded to drop by more than 75% from its peak in 2014 before bottoming out around $27. Since then, the market has made a significant rebound of 67% from its low in January 2016. However, many economists expect the recent, upward trajectory of oil prices to be short-lived, given the rising levels of supply and falling demand.
?
Growing Supply
As of June 2016, U.S. production is at its highest level since 1972, producing approximately 9 million barrels of oil per day (bpd), an increase of 89% over the past eight years. Additionally, OPEC is ramping up its output to 32.77 bpd, resulting in the largest rise in production since 2008. If OPEC continues to pump at this rate, then the surplus of oil is expected to jump to 950,000 bpd by the end of 2016, an increase of 160,000 bpd from the previous March estimate.
Along with production in 2016, U.S. oil imports are surging. Since approaching a 20-year low in May 2015, imports have risen by 20% to 8 million bpd, according to federal data. This phenomenon was caused by multiple factors, including a recently unsanctioned Iran, excess storage capacity and high domestic shipping costs.
Removal of Iran’s Sanctions
Despite Iran’s inability to export oil to the states, the lifting of its economic sanctions has contributed to an indirect upswing in U.S. imports. After sanctions were removed in January 2016, Iran began to undercut its competitors’ prices in an attempt to gain lost market share. Due to this underpricing, countries that had been cut out of the market in Asia and Europe took to selling to the U.S. market in a substantial manner for the first time since the shale boom.
Excess Storage Capacity
As of May 2016, demand for imports has been chiefly driven by oil traders. These traders are utilizing the relatively high excess storage capacity within the United States to hold oil and secure higher prices via the futures market. The United States has filled only approximately 66% of its total storage capacity and still has room for nearly 100 million more barrels of oil. In comparison, Europe’s storage capacity is 90% full, while those of both South Africa and China are virtually full. Moreover, the rise in imports is driven by the steep cost of transporting oil domestically by train, a process that is more expensive than importing foreign crude.
Falling Demand
While a record level of global supply promises to drive down oil prices by itself, demand is also waning. In 2015, the demand for oil had grown by 1.54 million bpd from the previous year. The forecast for 2016 predicts this growth in demand will slow to 1.2 million bpd by the end of the year. One of the causes of this slowdown is falling gross domestic product (GDP) growth worldwide. From 2014 to 2015, global GDP growth depreciated from 3.9 to 3.1%, and it is expected to maintain this trend into 2016, where economists predict the range of growth to be between 2.3 to 2.8%. Another major contributor to the decline in demand is the robust and resilient U.S. dollar. As it strengthens, oil becomes more expensive for people paying with foreign currencies. According to Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), a 5% increase in the dollar’s value could result in a drop in oil prices from 10 to 25%.
Investment Options
For investors looking to gain exposure to oil, the United States Oil Fund LP (NYSE Arca: USO) and the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSEARCA: XLE) are the most popular options. However, these funds have key differences. XLE, which has a low expense ratio of 0.14% and a high dividend yield of almost 3%, invests in 42 different oil companies globally, with Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) making up 33.65% of its portfolio. Its diversity of investment, as well as its favorable dividend yield and expense ratio, make XLE the best choice for long-term investors.
USO is only suitable for experienced investors looking to take a short-term position in oil. Due to the design of the ETF, which invests in near-month oil futures contracts to track daily price movements, USO bears an exorbitant management fee of 0.45% and is exposed to time decay. Every month, USO must sell its current futures contracts before expiration and roll out to the next month’s contracts. Due to the pricing of futures contracts, the longer a position is held in USO, the more likely it is for roll costs to occur as a result of time decay. To fully understand how these factors can affect the USO price in the long term, investors can examine the years of 2009 and 2010, when the spot price for oil increased by 98.74%, but USO only appreciated by 3.12%.
未經允許,不得轉載本站任何文章:
-
- 甲基橙
-
石油圈認證作者
- 畢業于中國石油大學(華東),化學工程與技術專業,長期聚焦國內外油氣行業最新最有價值的行業動態,具有數十萬字行業觀察編譯經驗,如需獲取油氣行業分析相關資料,請聯系甲基橙(QQ:1085652456;微信18202257875)